Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 414-415

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Dots in A (possible reading) & GE2

Wedges in A

No marks in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

It is uncertain what kind of staccato marks Chopin used in A at the beginning of these bars. The sign in bar 414 seems to be a small wedge, whereas the one in 415 – rather a dot. When repeating this fragment, Chopin wrote only one mark – a dot in bar 454. According to us, one can safely assume that Chopin had one type of marks in mind. The argument for wedges is the rhythmic similarity of these bars to bars 409-410, in which the use of wedges does not raise major doubts. On the other hand, the difference in articulation between these pairs of bars seems to be justified by a harmonic difference, particularly the change of mode from major to minor. In this situation, it is both the dots and the wedges that can be considered to be corresponding to Chopin's intention. No staccato marks in GE1 (→FEEE) must be an oversight, whereas GE2 added dots.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 414-416

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in sources

Slur suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest adding a slur over the passage in the R.H., as in bars 410-412. We lead the slur to the quaver at the beginning of bar 416 due to the reasons identified in the quoted note.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 414

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering

..

The digit 5, written in FEH, indicates a fingering corresponding to the articulation of the accompanying crotchets intended by Chopin – see the adjacent note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 414

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Wedge in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

No mark in FEH & GE3

..

According to us, the articulation markings, i.e. the wedge on the 3rd beat of the bar and the slur, are wrong in the majority of the sources. It is indicated by a comparison with analogous bars 410 and 438, in which it is the bass note on the 2nd beat of the bar that is provided with a staccato mark, whereas the slur encompasses the next two crotchets. The scheme of the accompaniment, in which, after the detached bass note, generally sustained with pedal, the hand moves to the chord position (often broken or repeated) is one of Chopin's favourite procedures. The wedge was crossed out in FEH, in which a fingering was also added; a fingering that confirms the articulation markings we adopted. The entries were probably performed during lessons with Chopin or on the basis thereof. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , GE revisions , Annotations in FEH

b. 414-415

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur from D in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

Slur from d in GE3

..

The slur of the majority of the editions is most probably inaccurate; therefore, in the main text, we write it from the 3rd beat of the bar, as in analogous bars 410 and 438.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions