|
b. 290
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In FE1 the accidental to the bottom note of the 1st R.H. chord is missing. The sharp was added by FE2. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 290
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
The missing wedges in FE1 and EE1 are probably oversights, corrected in FE2 according to A (→GE), and in EE2 imprecisely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , FE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 291-303
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
As far as beginnings of slurs in bars 291 and 299 are concerned, we decide to give priority to the consistent notation of EE and FE, without trying to reach final conclusions about Chopin's intentions in that respect. In GC, and partly in GE, the slurs in those bars run from the 1st crotchet . GE also has arbitrarily added slurs in the L.H. part. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In EE, the octave at the beginning of the bar is notated in the abbreviated form with 8. This is probably an arbitrary change that was introduced due to lack of space. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 291
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing staccato sign is certainly a mistake of GE1 (→FE→EE). In GE2, in spite of the clear wedge in A, a dot was added. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Wedges |
