|
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of GE1 (→FE→EE) is a result of Chopin's proofreading, which is proved by the traces of deletion of c1 on the 5th quaver in the bottom voice. However, a more detailed analysis of traces of corrections in print proves that it was also g2 that was being removed there. It means that Chopin most probably did not proofread the text of A, which was fine, but the false c1-a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||||
|
b. 283-286
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In such a quasi-parallel figuration, the slurs in the R.H. generally apply also to the L.H., particularly when both parts are written, partially or completely, on one stave. Therefore, the source notation without separate slurs for the L.H. may be considered to be complete. However, at the repetition of this fragment (bars 299-302), Chopin provided with slurs also the L.H., which, according to us, indicates rather the need to specify the notation than to differentiate between the markings of both four-bar fragments. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest adding slurs of the L.H. Slurs were introduced already in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 283-284
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we add pedalling markings on the basis of comparison with analogous bars 299-300. In bar 284, the addition was performed already in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||
|
b. 283
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering, written probably by the hand of the pupil in FEH, was changed in this bar – the a-g category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
|
b. 283-284
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The slur of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is almost certainly too long – the engraver must have confused the b3 quaver in bar 283 with the b2 quaver in bar 284, which is placed at the same height. Therefore, we acknowledge the correction introduced in GE3 in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
1-c2-g2 chord: 
. Concentrated on correcting the sound in the place of mistake, it is possible that the composer did not thoroughly check the context and resolved the e
in bar 284 in 
transition was initially marked with the 2 and 3 digits. The correction could have been suggested by Chopin, which is indicated by further compliance with the entry in 
