|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In FE (→EE1) the double grace note before the 3rd crotchet in the bar is A category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Over the L.H. octave in A there is a staccato dot crossed through with a vertical line. According to us, it was most probably supposed to be a wedge with which Chopin wanted to replace the initial dot. However, in GE (→FE,EE) the correction was understood as a deletion of the mark, which, although possible, we consider less likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
It is difficult to say what Chopin's motives were when he put such a long mark in a place that appears several times (even if we limit ourselves to the strictest analogy, 4 times – bar 283 and previously bar 112 and 116) and that he marked with clearly shorter signs the other times – long accents (bars 116-118, 277, 281 and 285) or their slightly longer counterparts. Therefore, in the main text we provide a long accent. The position of the marks – see bar 277. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings |
in 
before the last f
1. The accidental was added already in 
-B, which is a mistake and which results in two identical notes. The error was rectified in 
above chords in 
