mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 281

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Long accent in A (→GE)

No mark in FE

Vertical accent in EE
..

In FE the accent over the d2 minim was overlooked. The accent was added in EE – in the form of a vertical sign – probably on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 133. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 281

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In FE the 1st note was printed at the right pitch, yet without a ledger line.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 281

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

The fingerings written by Chopin in FED and FEH are compliant. In the main text, we include the more precise indications of FED.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH

b. 281-282

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

FE (→EE,GE1→GE2)

GE3
..

The position of ritenuto in FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), i.e. the end of bar 281, is probably erroneous:

  • adopting the natural assumption that ritenuto is to be applied until risoluto in bar 283 (cf. bars 407-408), we are faced with an almost a bar-and-a-half-long slowdown, the longest of the ones marked by Chopin in this movement of the Concerto. After a merely 8-bar-long prelude to the final figurational section of the exposition; according to us, such a pronounced slowdown is unjustified;
  • the 3rd beat of bar 281 and the 2nd of bar 282 are graphically identical, which could have provoked the engraver's mistake.

A corresponding change was suggested already in GE3.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 281-295

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

category imprint: