b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
A has an f1 as the most bottom note of the chord on the 3rd beat of the bar. The mistake was almost certainly committed at the time of writing this fragment in bold type (see the characterization of A) and did not pass to the editions, which suggests that the text was set in bold type already after GE1 had been finished. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of A |
|||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE1 (→GE2) is missing the cautionary before b2. It may indicate that the accidental was added only just in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE). The natural was reintroduced in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 345-346
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE is missing the dashes marking the range of diminuendo. It is probably an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
b. 345-346
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In both bars wedges instead of dots must have resulted from an ad hoc revision by the engraver of GE1, who unified these marks in the entire finale of the Variations. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
|||||||||
b. 345-347
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bar 342, the missing R.H. slurs in bars 345-346 are most probably Chopin's oversight, hence it would be appropriate to add slurs. We suggest three versions analogous to the complete versions of bars 341-343 and a fourth one modelled on the continuous slur in bars 359-361, yet maintaining separate the slur entered by Chopin into A at the beginning of bar 347. To the main text we choose the version analogous to the one proofread by Chopin in bars 341-343. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors of A |