b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 345
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A the slur under the motif in the R.H. ends on a, whereas the corresponding slur in the L.H. – on B. A comparison with the slurs in the next bar allows to consider the first of them to be inaccurate. The slurs in GE can be a result of Chopin's proofreading, since leading the slurs to the end of the motifs is more natural here – cf. the authentic slurs e.g. in bars 4-6. In turn, an earlier beginning of the slurs in FE (→EE), being contrary to the structure of the motifs, cannot come from Chopin and is probably a result of an erroneous interpretation of the slurs of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 345-346
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add cautionary flats before d2 in bar 345 and e1(2) in bar 346. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 345-346
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
This is the last bar on a page in A, which contributes to the uncertainty concerning the range of the slur started on the 2nd beat of the bar – the overpulled ending of the slur suggests continuation in the next bar; however, on a new page, in bar 346, there are no slurs. In GE (→FE→EE), the slur was led to the 1st chord in bar 346, which is almost certainly an accurate interpretation – cf. the slurring of the part of violin I in Morch as well as analogous bars 21-22. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |