|
b. 279-280
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we provide the unquestionable A slur, compliant with the one present in A in analogous bars 112-113. The GE and EE slurs, although compliant with the potentially authentic FE slur in the mentioned bars, cannot be coming from Chopin. The authenticity of the FE slur with a clearly wrong ending is also questionable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||
|
b. 279
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The A (→GE) and FE pedal markings, resulting in a momentary overlapping of harmonies, are, according to us, inaccurate. Due to the above, in the main text we provide markings modelled after analogous bar 283. A similar change was also introduced by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 279
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we keep the unconventional position of the ten. indication in A. Chopin most probably wanted to emphasise the need to hold, particularly, the e note, which does not stem from the GE notation at all (→FE,EE,IE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 279-280
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 280-282
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
after quaver in 
in