|
b. 281-282
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In EE1, the engraver overlooked the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The added e on the 3rd quaver is a revision of GE3, both arbitrary and unjustified. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with analogous phrases at the beginning of this movement of the Concerto may point to an inaccuracy of the slur in the 1st half of the bar – see the note to bar 30. We include that possibility in the form of our alternative suggestion. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
|
b. 281-284
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The fact that the notes are written in normal font in FE (→EE) is a result of the engraver having misunderstood A. A similar situation can be found in b. 307-309, 383-386 & 409-411. Such mistakes can also be encountered in other Chopin's pieces, e.g. in the Mazurka in C major, Op. 24 No. 2, b. 70-88 or the Prelude in C category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
hairpin. The mark was added already by the reviser of 
2 in 
