b. 343
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we include the raising e2 to e2, added by Chopin in the last phase of proofreading of FE2. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 343
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
FE are devoid of staccato dots under the quavers, which must be regarded as a mistake in this context. The marks were added in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 343
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In GE, the dashes marking the range of crescendo are led to the end of bar. It is an arbitrary revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 343
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The version of GE (→EE,FESB) resulted from a mistake by the engraver of GE1, who did not notice that the B-b octave at the beginning of the bar is written in a smaller font, as belonging to the orchestral part. Chopin restored the correct notation in FE. In order to avoid a similar misunderstanding, in the main text we specify that the soloist is to perform the b2 quaver with the left hand to end the quaver sequence from the previous bar. (Hand crossing is not to be applied when performing the piece without accompaniment.) category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 343-347
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The version of AsI is the initial version of the markings, in this bar enhanced by Chopin, but in analogous bars used also in the published version. The change of accent type is a typical arbitrary decision of EE – a similar situation is to be found in bar 347. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |