



b. 262
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
According to us, the placement of the category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Centrally placed marks , Inaccuracies in FESB |
|||||
b. 262-266
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In the main text we suggest adding a staccato dot in bar 262, as this is the only one among the four crotchets in analogous bars (bar 95, 99 and 266) that Chopin did not provide with a dot in A. In FE (→EE) dots are absent in all the above bars. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 262-263
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The FE slurs may be authentic, although the random nature of this variant rules out a serious change of concept. Chopin could have added these two four-quaver slurs in a place in which the copyist or the engraver overlooked the actual shorter slurs. They indicate rather musical articulation (motifs) than a pianistic gesture, as the L.H. slurs written in A in bars 95-96 and 99-100. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 262-263
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
In the main text we omit the unnecessarily repeated category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 263
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In GE there is no accent on the second beat of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |