Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 315-316

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 in FE (→EE)

 in GE1 (→GE2)

 in GE3

..

In FE (→EE), the placement of the  marks suggests that the first one concerns the R.H., whereas the second one, the L.H. Since it does not seem likely that such differentiation could be intended by Chopin in this context, both marks are probably misplaced. In the main text, we move them to between the staves, since, according to us, they refer to both hands. Changes striving in that direction were gradually introduced in GE1 (→GE2) and GE3. See also the adjacent note.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Placement of markings , GE revisions

b. 315-316

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

 under L.H. part in sources

 suggested by the editors

..

Just like in the case of the  marks, assigning both  marks to the L.H. is most probably a result of lack of space between the staves of FE.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 315-316

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED, bar 315

Fingering written into FEFo, bar 315-316

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

..

All indications denote almost certainly the same fingering. In the main text, we give the two ones written in FEFo, crucial in this context.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FEH , Annotations in FEFo

b. 315

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 315

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Long accent in GE1

Short accent in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE2

..

It is difficult to say how accurately the notation of the manuscripts was reproduced in the editions. Both versions are, of course, possible. In the main text we give the notation of FE (→EE) due to the Chopinesque additions to the dynamic markings in this and the previous bar, introduced at the stage of proofreading of FE. The absence of the mark in GE2 is most probably an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents