



b. 260
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Initially, the 1st L.H. quaver in A contained only the top note of the octave, F. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Bass register changes |
|||||
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The staccato dot written by Chopin in FEG may be ambiguous: it is not known whether it concerns the octave in the R.H. in bar 261 or the octave in the L.H. in the great stave right above it, in bar 256. It may be the reason explaining why the sign was not included in GE1 (→GE2→GE3). The sign included in EE is also not entirely clear – in spite of the fact that it resembles a wedge, it has a dot in its structure. Therefore, it is hard to conclude what was written in Chopin base text to EE; hence to the main text we adopt a staccato dot, written by Chopin's hand in FEG. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Wedges , Authentic corrections of EE |
|||||
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
In all base texts Chopin added a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major
..
The pedalling in this bar was written by Chopin only in the proofs of FE. Similarly in bars 273-276. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 261
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |