Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 260

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

..

Initially, the 1st L.H. quaver in A contained only the top note of the octave, F.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Bass register changes

b. 261

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

 
 
 
..

The staccato dot written by Chopin in FEG may be ambiguous: it is not known whether it concerns the octave in the R.H. in bar 261 or the octave in the L.H. in the great stave right above it, in bar 256. It may be the reason explaining why the sign was not included in GE1 (→GE2GE3). The sign included in EE is also not entirely clear – in spite of the fact that it resembles a wedge, it has a dot in its structure. Therefore, it is hard to conclude what was written in Chopin base text to EE; hence to the main text we adopt a staccato dot, written by Chopin's hand in FEG.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of GE , Wedges , Authentic corrections of EE

b. 261

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

..

In all base texts Chopin added a  sign. In GE2 (→GE3) this very characteristic for Chopin indication was changed to , used by the composer only occasionally.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions

b. 261

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

Pedalling in FE1

No pedalling in FE0 (→EE,FEGGE)

..

The pedalling in this bar was written by Chopin only in the proofs of FE. Similarly in bars 273-276.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 261

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Accent in A & GE2

No mark in GE1 (→FEEE)

..

The missing accent is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FEEE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions