|
b. 259-260
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Chopin wrote only triplet slurs in these bars. A comparison with the previous phrase suggests that it is an inaccuracy, perhaps following from the smorz. and rallent. indications, impeding writing the slurs. Therefore, in the main text we suggest slurs analogous to bars 257-258. The slurs in GE1 (→FE→EE) – the two-bar slur and the distorted triplet one in bar 259 – are probably a result of a revision and inaccuracy respectively (GE2 overlooked the slur in bar 259). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 259
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In GE, e is missing in the 1st chord, probably by mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 259-261
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The fact of leading the slur to the beginning of bar 261 is most probably an inaccuracy, which one can easily imagine, being aware of the Chopinesque panache when writing slurs, encountered in numerous autographs. There is no reason for the phrasing to obscure the natural division, marked by the progression's parts and underlined by the additional slurs in the bass in bars 261-264 and category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 259-261
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||||||||
|
b. 259
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Taking into account the identical context of bar 255, we consider the missing category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: No pedal release mark |
marks. Moving the beginning of the slur to the 2nd quaver in bar 259 is an arbitrary revision of 
suggested by the editors