Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 410-419

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

4 wedges in A

4 dots in GE

3 dots in FE

3 dots in EE

..

In A, the staccato marks at the beginning of bars 410-411 and 418-419 (in the part of the R.H.) are clear wedges – cf. the dots in the part of the L.H. The editions reproduced them as dots (as in the entire Concerto); at the same time, EE overlooked the sign in bar 410, whereas FE – in bar 418 (added in EE). 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies , Wedges

b. 410

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

No slur in sources

Slur suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest adding a slur, also in bars 411 and 414-415, on the basis of the authentic slur in bars 434-435.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 410

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In FE (→GE1GE2), the last semiquaver is already embraced with the octave sign, used for the notation of the 1st beat of the next bar. The mistake was corrected in GE3 and formally also in EE, in which the entire octave sign was removed (overlooked?).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Errors repeated in GE

b. 410

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

Fingering written into FEH

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

..

An identical fingering of EE and FEH almost certainly corresponds to the Chopinesque one – cf. the Etude in A minor, op. 25 no. 11, bar 9, which Chopin provided with a fingering that should be used also in the next, similarly structured passages, in particular in bars 11-12. However, taking into account the repeatability of the four-note figures of the passage, it seems to be highly unlikely that Chopin would have indicated the fingering in such a detailed manner as it was written both in EE and FEH. In the main text, we give the most likely interpretation of the Chopinesque entry in FED – two ones, determining the key moments of the change of hand position. The latter was perhaps supposed to be, also or only, an erasure of the prematurely printed 8 ​​​​​​​of the octave sign. The resulting fingering most probably corresponds to the indications in EE and FEH

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH

b. 410

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering

..

The fingering written in FEH, compliant with the authentic articulation of the L.H., could have been indicated by Chopin. There is a similar situation in bars 414 and 438.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH