Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 406

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

We add a cautionary  before e3 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 407-415

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

..

In EE there are cautionary neutrals before a-aoctave in bars 407-415. This may well be an editorial revision, similar to bars 65-73.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Cautionary accidentals

b. 407

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

Short accent in A (literal reading), EE & GE2

Long accent in A (possible interpretation) & GE1 (→FE)

..

The accent in A seems to be short; however, when the note head of the minim had not been set in bold type yet, the impression could have been different. Therefore, it may be possible that it is actually the accent in GE1 (→FE), clearly longer than the accents in bars 401-402, that reproduces the proportions between the accent and the note head before it was set in bold type, hence written by Chopin's hand. Since a long accent seems to be more appropriate in this case, in the main text we give a sign in the form interpreted by GE1.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , GE revisions

b. 407

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

2 staccato dots in GE3

4 dots suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we add staccato markings both next to the top quavers and next to both f​​​​​​​, considering their absence to be an oversight of Chopin, the engraver or both. We consider the version completed like in GE3 to be possibly intended by Chopin. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 408-409

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Slur in bar 409 in FE (→GE1GE2)

Slurs in EE

Dots & slurs in GE3

Slurs suggested by the editors

..

In bar 408, the absence of the slur in FE (→GE1GE2) must be an inaccuracy, which is supported by the slur in the next bar – it is difficult to imagine that Chopin would have indicated a possible performance difference of these pianistically identical figures only with the absence or presence of a slur. In EE, a slur was added over the semiquavers, whereas in GE3, in both bars the slur encompasses the last two beats of the bar; the first pair of semiquavers was marked, arbitrarily, with staccato dots.  

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions