b. 398
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing mark was probably unintended by Chopin. The addition we suggest is justified by the authentic pedalling of other fragments of a similar texture, e.g. bars 155-161. An identical addition was introduced in EE and GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |
||||||||
b. 398-399
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Two subsequent slurs starting later than in the adjacent figures must be an inaccuracy of FE, partially repeated in GE1 (→GE2) and EE. In the main text, we move the beginnings of the slurs to over the 1st semiquaver, in accordance with the musical sense and analogous figures. Such a revision was introduced already in GE3. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||
b. 399-432
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
In GC this whole part is notated in an abbreviated form as a repetition of bars 57-90. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
b. 399
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 399
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we suggest adding a mark before the upcoming harmonic change. A mark in the same place was added both in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , No pedal release mark |