|
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As was the case with b. 69, assuming an incorrect interpretation of [A], in the main text we suggest the notation of analogous b. 43. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 302-303
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As in previous analogous places, in FE (→EE) the L.H. part octaves are written down in a simplified manner with the use of con 8va from the 2nd beat of b. 302 to the end of the 1st beat of b. 303. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||||||
|
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
We add cautionary naturals to the octave E1-E in the main text. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 302
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
As in bar 276, splitting the first chord into two parts – the a1-c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 302-303
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the manuscripts these bars were almost certainly marked in an abridged manner as a repetition of b. 68-70. It means that FE (→EE) overlooked the slur here, present in those editions in b. 69-70 (or rather its complete version, since in those bars, in turn, the part of the slur falling on b. 70 was overlooked). We suggest such a slur as an alternative version, while in the main text we give a possible contextual interpretation of the notation of GE1, according to which we consider the slur going beyond the second out of the last four quavers in b. 303 to reach the end of the bar, in accordance with the slurs of FE in b. 44 and 277. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
1-a1 in sources
