



b. 240-246
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI in these bars, there is no indication that the bass line should be doubled an octave lower. It is likely that it is not an earlier version but a simplified, incomplete record, hence we do not regard it as a full-fledged variant. In all the remaining sources, the bass line is led in octaves, generally written down with the use of con 8va starting:
See also the adjacent note. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Bass register changes , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
||||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The change in the placement of the marcato indication, introduced by GE1 and the remaining editions, does not seem to be accidental; however, its authenticity remains uncertain. Therefore, in the main text we give the version of A, considering the notation of GE (→FE,EE,FESB) an equal variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 240-254
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
Chopin would encompass rests within phrases with a slur a number of times, e.g. in bar 245 and 249. However, this is not that kind of situation, hence the continuous FE slur is almost certainly a mistake, perhaps resulting from the inaccurate slurs of [FC]. It was considered a mistake already in EE. In the main text we give the unequivocal A slurs (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |
||||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The last R.H. quaver in FE1 is an f2-b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |