|
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The last R.H. quaver in FE1 is an f2-b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 240-246
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
In A the L.H. part is written in shorthand – only top octave notes and the con 8 - - - indication. GE (→FE,EE) wrote the octaves in full only in bars 240-243; it was only IE that wrote the entire section in full. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Abbreviated octaves' notation , |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The EE2 version resulted from a misunderstanding of the original notation – the reviser changed the writing from three-part to two-part. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 240
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt I
..
The deletions visible in A at the beginning of the bar reveal that Chopin initially wrote d category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Cautionary accidentals , Deletions in A , Enharmonic corrections |
|||||
|
b. 240-241
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV
..
Chopin extended the A slur for it to reach the f2 crotchet. Therefore, the version of the editions resulted from a totally unjustified arbitrary decision by the engraver of GE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Corrections in A |
2 fourth, which is a mistake. It was corrected – perhaps at Chopin's request – in 
1 as the bottom note of the 1st chord, accompanied by F
to the next d1 crotchet was most probably meant to cancel the alteration and not to perform the role of a cautionary accidental following d
