mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 344

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before a1.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 344

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

f1 in A (→GE)

a-f1 in FE (→EE), contextual interpretation
..

The addition of a in the proofreading of FE (→EE) is undoubtedly a Chopin improvement (it can be that Chopin corrected his own oversight in A). There is no extending dot next to this note, which, regardless of the reason, has to be considered an inaccuracy in this context.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 344

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before b2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 344

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we add a cautionary  before g2. The addition was introduced already in GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 344-346

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

..

In FE, the wavy lines next to the trill marks are short. We consider it to be an inaccuracy of notation – the need to trill throughout the entire value of the note seems to be obvious in this context – and extend the wavy lines in the main text accordingly. In GE and EE, the wavy lines are completely absent.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions