



b. 233
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The logic of the figuration's structure and a comparison with analogous bar 235 point to a Terzverschreibung error of FE. The conclusion finds confirmation in a correction of this note performed in pencil – perhaps with Chopin's hand – in FES. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Annotations in FES |
|||||
b. 233
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , fz – f |
|||||
b. 233-235
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The fingering of the first two semiquavers was added by Chopin, while proofreading FE (→EE). See also bar 237. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 233-235
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE3, in which the first quaver of the top voice in bars 233 and 235 is c3, was created almost 10 years after Chopin's death. The reason for the revision was probably the presence of c2 two quavers later. Moreover, it is the missing necessary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||
b. 233
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the additional crotchet stem next to B to be a mistake – apart from this place, in the entire eight-bar section (bars 232-239), it is only the accented, topmost notes of the bass voice that are prolonged. That voice creates a lively, dance phrase, marked with the indication ben marcato and separated with staccato dots or accents – the discussed crotchet would have blurred this clear image. Cf. bar 235. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE |