|
b. 224-225
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of in tempo to a Tempo in bar 225 in GE is either a routine revision or an inaccuracy. Omission of both indications in FE (→EE1) is undoubtedly an oversight. In EE2 (→EE3) they were added on the basis of comparison with GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The tie of c1, written in A in accordance with Chopin's habit as a short curved line before the second of the sustained notes, was reproduced accurately in GE1. However, the notation is illegible in print, hence most probably Chopin added a second longer curved line in the proofreading. The notation, which should be clear for anyone who saw A, turned out to be incomprehensible both for the engraver of FE (→EE) and – surprisingly – for the reviser of GE2. As a consequence, despite two ties, the c1 note is not sustained in those editions. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The notation of the harmonic legato (holding elements of chords with fingers), very detailed in A, was reproduced in the editions inaccurately. A fragment of the stem combining the notes of the a-c1 third was not included and the stem extending the first f1 was overlooked. As far as the mentioned third is concerned, the notation of A may be theoretically interpreted twofold: with a c1 crotchet or with an a-c1 crotchet. In this context, it is, however, clear that the a bass note is also to be extended. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
|||||||||
|
b. 224
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur in the majority of the editions is certainly a result of inaccuracy of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
before the last quaver, overlooked in 
