



b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors of FC |
||||||||||||
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 9-12
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 1, Mazurka in G minor
..
FES has pencil marks in every one of those bars, yet their meaning is difficult to decipher. category imprint: Source & stylistic information |
||||||||||||
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 4, Mazurka in B♭ minor
..
When read literally, the slur of A ends over the semiquaver f2. In our opinion, the phrasing aspect of that slur is an argument that points to its inaccurate notation. For our main text we assume the slur reaching the 2nd beat of bar 10, as Chopin clearly wrote two bars earlier. In GE (→FE→EE) the slur ends even earlier, which is surely not implied by the notation of A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||||||||
b. 9-10
|
composition: Op. 24 No. 3, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The first slur, encompassing the triplet, is written inaccurately in A, patently shifted to the left. This resulted in its earlier beginnig in GE1 (→FE→EE). The correct interpretation of the sign, in keeping with the analogous bars 5-6 as well as 29-30 and 33-34, was introduced in GE2. AI has different slurs here, as in bars 5-6. We propose the longer one as an alternative to the slurring in A. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |