Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 216

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

..

The deletion visible in A reveals that Chopin initially wrote a crotchet stem for the a2 quaver; eventually, however, he decided to replace it with an accent.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A

b. 216

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

2 staccato dots in A, probable reading

No marks in remaining sources

8 staccato dots suggested by the editors

..

Both dots visible in A over the first two R.H. semiquavers are quite far from the notes and clearly not in the same line (vertically speaking); therefore, one wonders whether they are not accidental spots. However, the dots are clear and regular, while the shifts with respect to the notes they probably concern are similar both in terms of distance and direction. Therefore, we assume that they are staccato dots with which Chopin indicated a slightly different type of articulation – most probably lighter – of the  semiquavers. In the main text, for the sake of clarity, we suggest adding dots in the entire 1st half of the bar.
The markings were not included by GE1 and the remaining editions, perhaps due to the atypical placement described above. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in GE

b. 216-217

composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor

Slurs divided above rest in A (→GE)

Slurs divided above barline in FE (→EE)

..

The FE (→EE) slurs almost certainly resulted from inaccuracies in the reproduction of the A notation, committed by the copyist or by the engraver, or by both.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 216-217

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

5 staccato dots in A

4 wedges in GE (→IE)

Wedges in b. 217 in FE

No marks in EE1

4 dots in EE2

..

In the main text we reproduce the 5 staccato marks – undoubtedly dots – entered into A. In GE (→IE) the mark at the beginning of bar 217 was omitted, while the remaining ones were reproduced as wedges. The absence of the marks in FE (bar 216) and EE1 (in both bars) is due to the engravers' mistakes. In EE2 marks were added in the places in which they are present in GE, yet dots were used, as in bar 215.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions , Wedges

b. 216

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

Quavers in A

Crotchets in GE (→FE,EE,IE)

..

At the beginning of bar 216 and 220 in the main text we keep the typical, simplified A rhythmic notation. In GE (→FE,EE,IE) the rhythmic value of the top note was changed to a crotchet, most probably in order to complete the top voice rhythm. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions