|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A comparison with analogous phrases at the beginning of this movement of the Concerto may point to an inaccuracy of the slur in the 1st half of the bar – see the note to bar 30. We include that possibility in the form of our alternative suggestion. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||
|
b. 281-284
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The fact that the notes are written in normal font in FE (→EE) is a result of the engraver having misunderstood A. A similar situation can be found in b. 307-309, 383-386 & 409-411. Such mistakes can also be encountered in other Chopin's pieces, e.g. in the Mazurka in C major, Op. 24 No. 2, b. 70-88 or the Prelude in C category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
||||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The beginning of the phrase mark in A is unclear, since it blends with the L.H. slur. However, it is most likely that the phrase mark begins more or less midway between the first two quavers. It is also in analogous b. 383 that it is uncertain from which note the phrase mark should start according to Chopin. In the main text we include the notation of the remaining sources, with a phrase mark led from the 1st note of the bar. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness issues: Inaccurate slurs in A |
||||||
|
b. 281
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
Like in b. 48, the chord with additional b1 present in the sources is most probably a mistake of Chopin. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
2 in 
