



b. 199
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE1 (→FE2) is certainly erroneous. Chopin (most probably) corrected it, while proofreading FE3 (→FE4) and while performing the base text to EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
b. 199
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 199-200
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Two curved lines visible in A – the tie of g1 and the phrase mark in bar 200 – were reproduced in GE (→FE→EE) as one phrase mark, running from the 2nd minim in bar 199. The reason for the misunderstanding of the notation of A was most probably the Chopin manner of writing ties: in this case the engraver probably considered the tie to be combining the e1 minim in bar 199 with the g1 crotchet in bar 200. In GE (→FE) the second minim in the R.H. in bar 199 was divided into two voices – a c1-e1 third and b category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 199-200
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 199
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The flat, in A (→GE) restoring b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE |