Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 272

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

The middle note of the arpeggiated chord, f1, is a crotchet of the bottom voice in A (→GE). In FE it was assigned to the top one, which shortened its value to a quaver – it is probably a result of Chopin's proofreading. In EE, an extending dot was added to the quaver adopted from FE

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 272

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→FEEE) the long accent present in A was overlooked. The accent was restored in GE2 but as a short one.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 272

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

..

In A Chopin wrote in the part of the R.H. the text of the next bar by mistake. Having noticed the error, he crossed out the bar and wrote the correct text on an adjacent stave.

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A

b. 272

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In GE1 (→GE2), there is no  before the second quaver. It must be a mistake – between two bars based on the same four-note diminished chord containing g, a possible g would require a cautionary , not to mention the tied in violin II. It was most probably [A] that was the source of the mistake, since the  in FE was added only just in print. The mark was added in GE3.  

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in GE

b. 272-273

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

No fingering in FE (→GE)

Fontana's fingering in EE

..

In the main text, we include the change of fingers, written by Chopin in FED. The fingering of EE actually does not exclude the use of this procedure, yet it seems to be highly unlikely that Fontana would not have marked such a characteristic fingering if he had taken it into account.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Differences in fingering