Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 268

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

in GE

No mark in FE (→EE)

..

As was the case with  in b. 261 and with  in b. 267, another missing dynamic marking in FE (→EE) points to additions (entered by Chopin into [A] after [FC] had been finished) as the most likely explanation for the differences.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 268-281

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Pedalling in GE

No markings in FE (→EE)

..

In b. 268-277 and 279-281, in the main text we include the pedal markings of GE, entered probably into [A] after [FC] had been finished. See also b. 271 and 278.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 268-273

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

As before, in FE (→EE) the octaves at the beginning of b. 268-271 and on the 2nd beat of b. 272-273 are written in a way that an entire octave is encompassed with the stem of the bottom voice quaver, and it is only the top note that is provided with an additional crotchet stem. It must be a mistake, which is evidenced by the dots prolonging both notes of the octaves in b. 270-273. To the main text we adopt the notation of GE, which is undoubtedly correct.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE

b. 268

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

The triplets in the 2nd half of the bar are written in A (→GE1FE,EE) as demisemiquavers instead of semiquavers. The mistake was corrected by GE2 (→GE3,FESB).

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE

b. 268

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Slurs delimiting triplets in A (→GEFE1,EE)

No triplet slurs in FESB

..

In accordance with the General Editorial Principlesp. 16, in the main text we omit the 4 slurs present in the majority of the sources; these slurs are part of the triplet markings, and they unnecessarily overlap the articulation slurs of the same range. The slurs were also omitted by FESB.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: FE revisions , Triplet slurs