mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 267

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Grace note in AsI & A (→GE→FE,EE)

No grace note in FESB
..

The missing grace note is probably an oversight by the engraver of FESB; in this bar, he also overlooked 2 accents.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 267

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

2 horizontal accents in A (→GE→FE1)

2 vertical accents in EE

1 accent in FESB
..

The change of the type of accents to the vertical one was an arbitrary decision of EE, quite frequent. The missing accent on c2 is most probably an oversight by the engraver of FESB.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 267

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

in AsI & A (→GE→FE1,EE)

No ornament in FESB
..

The missing  mark in FESB must be an oversight of the engraver; in this bar, he also overlooked 2 accents and a grace note.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 268

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

 
 
..

In GE1 there is no bottom note of the chord on the first beat of RH.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 268-270

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

 in EE & FE

GC

GE

Our alternative suggestion
..

Differences in the scope of the dynamic hairpin  may be accidental. Along with source versions we propose the hairpin modelled after the solution adopted in three previous analogous places. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources