|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196-198
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
Out of the two digits visible in FEH in analogous places in bars 196 and 198, in the main text we include only the first one, written probably by Chopin. This entry confirms Fontana's fingering, at least in its part from the 3rd to the 6th semiquaver in bar 196. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FEH |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
There are three natural ways to add the rhythmic value in which the notation of FE is lacking; we give them as potentially compliant with Chopin's intention. Two of them were implemented already in the first editions. In the main text, we give the rhythm adopted in GE, which, according to us, is most likely due to the calming of the course of music (rallentando in the next bar) and due to the presence of that very rhythm in an analogous context in bar 440. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors resulting from corrections , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The lack of an arpeggio sign in EE is most probably an oversight by the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 196
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
The arpeggio sign added in EE may be regarded as a revision, although one cannot exclude a mistake – the engraver might have mistaken for an arpeggio sign one of the lines that form the treble clef. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
before f2.
