b. 265
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE (→EE1) overlooked the restoring e1. The accidental, most probably overlooked by Chopin, cf. bar 267, was added in GE and EE2 (→EE3). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||
b. 265-267
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of FE (→EE) is almost certainly erroneous:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Sign reversal , Partial corrections |
||||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to us, the slurs combining e with f and e1 with f1 are a result of a mistake of the engraver of FE, who placed them to the left-hand side of the chord in b. 266, whereas they should be ties, placed to the right-hand side of the chord. It is supported by the following arguments:
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Sign reversal , Partial corrections |
||||||
b. 265
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the beginning of the sotto voce indication was placed on the mark, which had been written earlier. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
||||||
b. 265-269
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In the main text we suggest adding pairs of the Tutti-Solo indications in b. 264-265 and 268-269. They were also added in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |