Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 195

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Arpeggio sign in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE

..

In GE, there is no apreggio mark before the 2nd chord of the bar, which is most probably an oversight of the engraver.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 195-210

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

category imprint:

b. 195

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 195-196

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

Short accents in A

Long accents in GC (→GE) & FE

Vertical accents in EE

..

The four accents in A, although rather big, are nonetheless distinctly shorter than long accents e.g. in bars 39, 41-43 or 68. In GC accents are much longer what was reproduced in GE (the marks in GE are longer than accents in e.g. bars 179-180 or 184). FE has long accents as well, but EE arbitrarily replaced them with vertical accents.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in GC

b. 195

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

Chromatic scale in A (→FCGE, →FE) & EE2 (→EE3)

Diatonic scale in EE1

..

The version of EE1 repeats the mistake of FE, which was corrected in the last phase of proofreading in FE. In EE2 (→EE3) the correct text was introduced probably on the basis of comparison with analogous b. 63 and 646.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Errors in FE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE