b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
|||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II category imprint: Interpretations within context; Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 265
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
One could be looking for Chopin's proofreading in appearing in the editions. However, according to us, a misunderstanding is more likely – the engraver may have introduced by mistake the marking from the previous bar, or, upon looking at the bottom of the page of ½A, he repeated written under the double bass part in Morch. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
b. 265-266
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
There are neither traces of removal nor reasons to remove the accents in the proofreading of GE1, hence their absence is most probably an oversight. The signs were restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 265-267
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, there are no accidentals before the 7th semiquaver in bars 265 and 267 and before the 8th semiquaver in bar 266. Chopin's oversight of the naturals restoring a1 is obvious both in bars 265 and 267 (A minor chord in the L.H.) and in bar 266 (correctly written, identical bar 264). In all remaining editions, some or all missing naturals were added: category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions |