Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 263-264

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

 end of bar 264 in A (→FE,FCGE)

 beginning of bar 263 in EE

..

The  asterisk was shifted in EE, probably under the influence of analogous b. 130-132.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 263-264

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

Just like in b. 131-132, in the main text we keep the notation of the bars filled with rests, used by Chopin in A (→FC) and applied in GE2 too. The changes introduced in the remaining editions, i.e. replacing both bars with one double bar in FE (→EE) and providing the rests with digits, cannot come from Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , FE revisions

b. 263

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

FE are lacking in the  raising a to a, which is a patent mistake, corrected in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 263-264

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

In GE2 b. 263-264 fall between the lines, which could have caused the later start of the slur.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 263-267

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Continuous slur in GE

2 slurs in FE (→EE)

..

The division of the slurs in FE (→EE) could have been caused by, e.g. an inaccurate notation of the handwritten basis in the transition to a new line. Therefore, in the main text we give the slur of GE, which does not raise any source or stylistic doubts.

category imprint: Differences between sources