



b. 188
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
GE has an additional c1 note on the last quaver in the bar. It is most probably a mistake of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||||
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In such a context, the staccato dots written over the R.H. (as it is in A, GE and FE) are valid also in the L.H. In the main text, we suggest adding signs in the L.H. due to the added accents in the previous bar and change of the placement of the dots in the R.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||||
b. 188-189
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of A was indeed written with two moves, yet interpreting it as two slurs is, according to us, an unnecessary complication, incompatible with Chopin's intention. It may be that GE1 initially printed only one of the slurs, so that adding a second was a correction of a patent mistake – cf. bars 190-192. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
||||||||||
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
The differences in the length of the wavy line of the trill are most probably accidental. There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the version of FE. The version of EE must be erroneous – if the b1 in bar 188 was not supposed to be encompassed with the trill, there would be no reason to drag the wavy line over the naturals introducing a new key. According to us, a possible Chopinesque proofreading of GE is also unlikely – a single note, in this case an a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
b. 188
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In GE, there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |