The differences in the length of the wavy line of the trill are most probably accidental. There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the version of FE. The version of EE must be erroneous – if the b1 in bar 188 was not supposed to be encompassed with the trill, there would be no reason to drag the wavy line over the naturals introducing a new key. According to us, a possible Chopinesque proofreading of GE is also unlikely – a single note, in this case an a
1, is a natural way of ending a trill in such a context.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: Inaccuracies in GE, EE inaccuracies
notation: Ornaments