|
b. 242
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 242
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The version of GE is most probably a result of a revision, which, however, does not rule out the possibility that it could be compliant with Chopin's intention – see the note in b. 222. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |
||||||||
|
b. 242
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary accidentals to the 2nd R.H. sixth. They were also added by EE. A similar situation is to be found in b. 244. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 242
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In the main text we give the accent added probably by Chopin in the stage of proofreading FE (→GE,EE) instead of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 242-244
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In A, each of the subsequent 7 sextuplets in b. 242-245 is provided with a digit 6 and a separate slur, irrespective of the primary slur encompassing the entire chromatic sequence. Apart from minor inaccuracies, this notation was reproduced in the editions too. Such accuracy in marking a most regular structure is exceptional not only in Chopin's manuscripts, but also in the editorial practices in general. In this situation, we keep it in the main text, although the mUltimate Chopin editors did not find any potential reason for this uncommon notational consistency convincing enough to be worth mentioning. Our alternative suggestion is a simplified notation, adapted to the principles we adhere to in our transcriptions – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in FE , Triplet slurs |
in 
