Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 230-231

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

..

In FE0 (→FE,EE) the slur ends on the last semiquaver in bar 230. In FEG (→GE) Chopin extended the slur to the 1st crotchet in bar 231. The composer probably overlooked the respective correction in the base texts to EE and FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE

b. 230-231

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

..

In GC – undoubtedly in accordance with [A] – the part of the L.H. is written in these bars in an abbreviated manner, as repetition of bar 229.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: Abbreviated notation of A

b. 230-231

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No tie in GC (→GE)

Tie in FE (→EE)

..

Same as in bars 30-31 (the recapitulation is not written out in GC), the absence of the tie sustaining a2 is probably an oversight of the copyist.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 230-231

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

..

The natural before the 5th quaver in the L.H. in bar 230 (c1) was added only in GE2. The natural before the 1st quaver in bar 231 (d1) is absent in FE; it was added in EE. The sign is also in GC, in which it is added by Chopin's hand (in bar 43), and in GE, which is based on it.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , GE revisions

b. 230

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I

Long accents in A, contextual interpretation

Short accent in GE1 (→FEEE)

Short accents in GE2

..

In this bar, it is unclear what kind of accents Chopin meant – in A the first two may be interpreted as long or short, the third one is long and the fourth one is short. A comparison with analogous bars – see bar 226, allows to resolve the doubt in favour of long accents. We discuss the fourth of them separately due to the sign's vague placement.

In GE1 (→FEEE), the first and third accents were overlooked, which was corrected in GE2. All accents in the editions are short, although the sign in FE could be considered to be long.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Long accents , Errors in GE , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A