



b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The missing accidental before the antepenultimate semiquaver contributes to a certain obscurity concerning Chopin's intention. Although the official rule of validity of accidentals was the same as today, he would often use them as valid not only at their absolute pitch, but also in other octaves. However, in this case E category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves |
||||||
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The longer slur in FE (→EE) is a result of a proofreading – one can see traces of deletion of the slur repeated from GE1. This kind of change to FE could have been introduced only by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The staccato dot over the last chord in GE1 (→FE→EE) was probably overlooked. However, in the proofreading of FE Chopin changed the concept of phrasing and articulation of the 2nd half of the bar, by embracing the chord with a slur and at the same time authorising the missing staccato. In the main text we adopt the changed version. GE2 returned the dot after A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 171
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |