



b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the main text we give the dim. indication written by Chopin in FEcor (→FE→EE). In GE1 (→GE2→GE3) an extended, dimin. form was used, and in later GE,s the indication was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
On the 4th beat of the bar there is a superfluous category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
A includes two category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 11, Etude in E♭ major
..
In the main text we adopt the quaver tie system applied by Chopin in A. In FE (→GE,EE) the ties in the L.H. may have been changed due to graphic difficulties, embracing three last quavers in bar 8 with one tie and providing the 1st quaver in bar 9 with a stem. In GE3 a similar tie system was applied in bar 8 also in the case of the R.H. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 5, Etude in G♭ major
..
In A the first chord in the L.H. is a crotchet. The possible mistake (theoretically it could be considered as a simplified two-voice notation) was corrected in FE (→GE,EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE |