b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
The slur of FE (→GE,EE) is obviously erroneous – the engraver led the slur to the end of the line, as it is in A. At the same time, he did not pay attention to the difference in the text's division into great staves: in A the line ends with bar 8, while in FE – with bar 9. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 10, Etude in A♭ major
..
A lacking before the penultimate quaver is most probably a mistake by Chopin. The accidental was added by the revisers in both GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
The fingering of EE is an addition by Fontana. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 4, Etude in C♯ minor
..
According to us, the combination, very rarely used by Chopin, is most probably an inaccurately reproduced mark, which was used by Chopin on a number of occasions (e.g., in the autograph of the Etude in E major, No. 11, bars 17-25). Cf. bar 1. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
||||||||||||
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 10 No 3, Etude in E major
..
In the main text we include the fingering added by Chopin in FED and the slur, embracing this group of semiquavers in A. In EE Fontana gave the identical fingering, marked in a more accurate manner. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED |