



b. 149
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Due to the graphic retouches of this fragment of the page, GE1a is lacking in demisemiquaver secondary beams in the R.H. beams on the 2nd and 3rd beats of the bar. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 149-152
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the changes of pedal under b. 149-150 and 151-152, present only in AF (→FE→EE), in a variant form. When choosing one of the versions, it is also the variants of dynamic indications that should be taken into account – in the sources the shorter pedalling markings are associated with more precise dynamic indications. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 149-151
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In b. 149 and 151 the autographs are devoid of cautionary accidentals. In the first stage of proofreading of FE (→EE) a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||
b. 149
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||
b. 149
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In AsI there are no accidentals before the last two demisemiquavers in the bar. This time, Chopin's patent oversight – cf. analogous b. 137, 141 and 145 – remained unnoticed also in A (→GE→FESB,EE1→EE2). It was only FE and EE3 that added flats restoring b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors of A , Authentic corrections of FE , Omitted correction of an analogous place , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |