|
b. 140-141
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II
..
The range of the slurs in GC is unclear due to the nonchalant way of their notation, as well as due to the transition into the new line of the text (from bar 141). We consider the division of the slurs at the bar line to be the literal interpretation, as at the beginning bar 141 does not include the ending of the previous slur. Such divided slur is also in EE, based on the base text, in which the slurs were most probably added by Chopin (in this fragment). Therefore, we give the version in the main text. According to us, however, the interpretation of the slurs of GC with division after the 1st crotchet in bar 141 is more justified. The slur of GE is rather an emergency option, not determining the phrasing, than an attempt to reproduce the notation of GC. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GC , Authentic corrections of EE |
||||||||
|
b. 140-159
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
In A almost the entire reprise (bars 105-171) is written in an abbreviated manner, in the form of empty, numerated bars, corresponding to bars 1-67. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
|
b. 140
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 140
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
..
A fingering digit is the most likely interpretation of the diagonal line performed in pencil visible in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 140
|
composition: Op. 64 No 3, Waltz in A♭ major
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
in 