mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 181-182

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering
..

The fingering in FEH was written probably by the same hand that corrected the fingering in the L.H., hence most probably Chopin. Due to this reason, we give it in the main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 181

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In FE, there is no  lowering d​​​​​​​2 to d2. The patent defect was corrected in the remaining editions.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 181-184

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

No slurs in A (→FE,EE)

3 slurs in GC (→GE)
..

As in analogous bars 177-180, the three R.H. slurs were written into GC (→GE) almost certainly by Chopin. In GE1 the slur in bar 183, last in the line, reaches only the last semiquaver even though the next bar holds its ending. The flaw was rectified in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections in GC , Uncertain slur continuation

b. 181

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Convergent slurs in AI

Continuous slur in AF (→FE→EE)

Separate slurs in GE
..

In AI a new slur starts from the c1 minim, although ink did not flow from the pen immediately. Therefore, both the continuous slur of AF (→FE→EE) and the separate slurs of GE may be considered derivatives of this notation. In the main text we adopt the slur of the principal source, GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccurate slurs in A

b. 181

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

in GE

No mark in FE (→EE)

Our variant suggestion
..

The fact that the mordent is absent in FE (→EE) also in analogous b. 240 makes us approach a possible oversight of that ornament with caution. This means that both versions are most probably authentic, while determining their chronology – problematic (as usual in this Polonaise). Due to the above fact, in the main text we opt for a variant version, i.e. mordent in brackets.

category imprint: Differences between sources