b. 177-181
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
In the main text, we add cautionary accidentals before the 2nd semiquavers in bars 177, 179 and 181 – a before c2, a before b1 and a1. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
b. 177-180
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Three consecutive, approximately one-bar-long slurs were writtne into GC (→GE) almost certainly by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections in GC |
|||||||||
b. 177
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In both autographs the accent in this bar is shorter than the previous ones, although – particularly in AI – it is not entirely certain whether the difference is to be regarded as significant. Taking into account the different rhythmic value of the chord, we assume that the accent's length is correlated with it. Just like in the previous bars, the accent in AI and AF is closer to the L.H. part, which, according to us, is an inaccuracy. In the main text we reproduce the combined > marks, typical of Chopin, after GE1; the marks are an appropriate ending of the preceding crescendo. The separate accent in GE2 must be a revision. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 177-180
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give the hairpin after GE. A simultaneous use of a dynamic hairpin and a nominally equivalent verbal indication can often be found in Chopin's works (it is particularly the combination of and cresc. that is very typical). category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
b. 177-179
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In the main text we give dimin. after GE. The absence of the dashes marking its range can be explained by the presence of a hairpin in this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources |