mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 176

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

In the main text, we omit the unjustified  before b2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 176

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Fingering written into FEJ

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEJ

b. 176

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

..

We add a cautionary  before b1 in the L.H. In the analogous bar 172 the homologous  occurs in all the sources.

category imprint: Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information

issues: Cautionary accidentals

b. 176

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In the main text we suggest an accent, written by Chopin in analogous b. 32. The need to accentuate this syncopation, co-creating a characteristic, polonaise cadence, goes without saying.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 176

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

f2-e2 slur in sources

2 slurs suggested by the editors
..

It is the different slurring with respect to analogous b. 32 that is noteworthy. Due to the highly likely abridged notation of the reprise of the main section of the Polonaise in [A], this difference must have occurred in print, e.g. as a result of Chopin's proofreading in b. 32. In the main text we suggest adding slurs while maintaining the source slur, since it emphasises the significance of the f2 crotchet, thus kind of replacing the accent present in b. 32. 

category imprint: Editorial revisions