|
b. 175-180
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The change of the font of accents in EE is a characteristic manner of this edition. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur in A is almost certainly an oversight – Chopin overlooked all markings in the L.H. in bars 174-176, opening a new page in A. The slur added in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2) is most probably a result of Chopin's proofreading. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
|
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
A comparison of the slurs in analogous bars 175-176 and 530-531 leads to the conclusion that they are most probably inaccurate in both places. Chopin was not utterly careful when it comes to such short slurs over the motifs whose range is clearly defined in another way, in this case by the arrangement of beams, accents and staccato marks. Due to this reason, in the main text we unify all these slurs (we also add the overlooked second slur in bar 176), considering the endings of the slurs in the exposition and the beginnings in the recapitulation to be reliable. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In the main text we suggest a slur after analogous bars 171-172 where Chopin added a slur in GC. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
