b. 176
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of A |
|||||||||||
b. 176
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In FE and GE the slur was moved under the dyads, which effectively changed its meaning – instead of embracing the c2-b1 motif, it indicates to hold f1. Moreover, both in GE and in EE, a similarly placed slur was arbitrarily added in the 2nd half of the bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Placement of markings , GE revisions |
|||||||||||
b. 176
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
Chopin omitted a lowering b2 to b2 at the beginning of bar, and a restoring b1 in the 2nd half of bar. An oversight of both the alteration and its canceling may seem improbable but happened to Chopin a few times, e.g. in Etude in F minor, op. 25 no. 2, bar 56. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in FE |
|||||||||||
b. 176-177
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Although the slur in bar 176 is not continued in bar 177 (on a new page of A), the continuation is suggested so clearly that in GE it was led to the first quaver in bar 177. However, this undoubtedly correct version was not reproduced in FE (→EE), which is either a mistake of the engraver of FE or a proof of a correction of the slur in GE1 in the last phase of proofreading. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccurate slurs in A |
|||||||||||
b. 176
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero
..
In the main text, we add an accent, overlooked by accident, as it seems. category imprint: Editorial revisions |