|
b. 174-175
|
composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major
..
In the first half of the bar, in A (→EE,GC→GE) the L.H. beam links all three quavers. In FE the first quaver is separated from the following two, what seems not to be the result of Chopin's correction. category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
Just like in b. 30, in the main text we suggest adding pedalling markings after analogous b. 212. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 174-176
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In both preserved autographs the accents are clearly closer to the bottom stave. According to us, it does not mean that it is only the two bottom notes of the chords performed by the L.H. that should be accented, which could have attenuated this dramatic culmination in AI and AF feature long accents, which was not taken into account in any of the editions. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Long accents , Placement of markings |
|||||||||
|
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor
..
In FE, there are no dots prolonging the 1st chord. The patent mistake was corrected by GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 174
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
dynamics. (Chopin might have wanted to emphasise g
1, to which the bass voice in the preceding progression was led.) Due to the same reason, it is difficult to assume that the accents under the R.H. part visible in 
to g2.