b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
A separate slur for the L.H. was added in the proofreading of FE1, most probably by Chopin. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
It is hard to state whether the simplified notation of the part of the R.H. in FE (→GE,EE) resulted from Chopin's proofreading or the engraver's inaccuracy. The first of these possibilities is indicated by the addition of the lento indication in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
All sources include naturals before d2 in bar 175 and before A in bar 176. Together with the in bar 172 they prove that, after having changed the key signature signs, Chopin's awareness of the key in which the music is written was not entirely formed yet. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
b. 175-176
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurring of GC is certainly incomplete and it was completed already in GE. In the main text we give the slur of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Errors of GC |
||||||||
b. 175
|
composition: Op. 26 No 2, Polonaise in E♭ minor
..
The lento indication is undoubtedly a Chopin addition in the proofreading of FE1. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE |