|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 161-164
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The slurs, added both in EE and – to a lesser extent – in GE2, are certainly inauthentic. The slur in bar 162 can be considered to be justified in the light of the authentic slur in identical bar 166. According to us, in this context, the difference can suggest a slightly different performance, e.g. a more pronounced crescendo, hence we preserve the differentiated notation of A in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text, we omit the cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of FE (→EE,GE1→GE2) is clearly inaccurate – it begins in the place where the octave sign ends in these editions. The slur in the autograph most probably encompassed the entire irregular group of semiquavers – Chopin would write this kind of slurs routinely, to a certain extent (cf. e.g. the Concerto in F minor, op. 21, the 2nd mov., bars 26, 28, 30, 31). Therefore, in the main text we suggest such a slur, introduced also in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
before c3, present in all sources.
