|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The minor difference in the placement of the stretto indication may be considered to be significant. According to us, its correct reproduction in GC is more likely, as the engraver of FE could have considered the shift of the sign to the beginning of the bar to be a routine action ordering the notation. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The cautionary signs next to c3, e category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE1 is most probably a mistake (corrected in FE2 and subsequent FE), as in GC one can see no traces of corrections in this place. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , FE revisions |
|||||||
|
b. 161-163
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
Starting from the second slur in bar 162, the slurring of the sources is compatible with the accents – the accents fall on the beginnings of the motifs separated with slurs. No such compatibility in the case of the second slur in bar 161 and first in bar 162 may be a result of their omission by Chopin, while he was making transition from triplet to phrasing slurs in [A]. Therefore, we suggest a unified phrasing slurring as an alternative to the source version. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
|||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the pedalling of FE (→EE), compatible with the harmonic narrative and subsequent repetitions of similar figures. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GC |
3 and c were added by us. In turn, the flats before g
on 3rd crotchet in 