mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 158-159

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No slur in FE (→GE,EE)

Slur suggested by the editors
..

In the main text, we suggest here a slur modelled after the entry in FED placed two bars earlier.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 158

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

..

Both autographs are lacking in the  restoring e on the 3rd beat of the bar, which is a patent oversight. The accidental was added in FE (→EE), which could have been performed by the reviser. It is also present in GE, and the layout of the accidentals before this dyad in GE1 also points to the fact that the sign was added in print (cf. the correct layout in GE2). 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A , FE revisions

b. 158-161

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

cresc. - - in bar 161 in AF (→FE→EE)

cresc. - - in bar 158 in GE
..

In the main text we give the version of AF (→FE→EE), in which a continuous cresc. begins only just in the second half of the eight-bar section. The version of GE, also undoubtedly authentic, can be considered an equal variant. A similar situation can be found in b. 166-169.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

b. 158-168

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

..

These bars are absent in FE1, since in the only known copy coming from that impression the leaf containing pages nos. 5-6 is missing (including b. 105-168).

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Incomplete sources

b. 158-160

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

Shorter  in A

Longer  in FE

Extended  in GE & EE

Shortened  in GE1a
..

According to us, the extension of the  hairpin in FE goes beyond – particularly in b. 158, at the beginning of the mark – a routine adjustment to the rhythmic structures. Therefore, we assume that it is a result of proofreading (carried out by Chopin), and this is the version we give in the main text. In A one can see that both the beginning and the ending of the hairpin are placed in a manner that they do not blend in with the other elements of notation. In GE and EE the mark was extended at the end of b. 160, which was an arbitrary decision, devoid of practical meaning. The mark having been shortened by GE1a is a mistake resulting from the transition to a new page (from b. 160).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins , Authentic corrections of FE